Data trust and AI
Data quality score
The average share of records passing quality checks (completeness, valid ranges, no duplicates) across all source systems, out of 100.
- Group, year to dateDemo: demo figure, not measured data
- 93
- average across sources, out of 100
- Watch
How it’s calculated
Records passing quality checksRecords checked × 100Records passing quality checks ÷ records checked × 100
Higher is better. Group figures add the numerators and the denominators across concessions, then divide. Averaging concession values would over-weight small networks.
In the demo, group figures are concession values weighted by network length.
Target and ownership
- Target
- ≥ 95
- Watch
- Between 90 and 95
- Off target
- Below 90
- Approved by
- Data Governance Board, May 2026
- Owner
- Head of Data
- Reported
- Daily
How far to trust it
- Source system
- Data quality monitor
- Feed
- Operational logs (TMC, SOS, SCADA), every 1 min
- Freshness
- In window
- Data quality
- 95 of 100
- Validated
- 93% of values
From source to screen
- Source systemData quality monitor at each concession
- FeedOperational logs (TMC, SOS, SCADA), refreshed every 1 min
- ChecksCompleteness, valid ranges and duplicates; failing records are held back
- CalculationRecords passing quality checks ÷ records checked × 100, daily
- Used inOverview, theme pages, reports and the assistants
By concession
| Concession | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ruta Portuaria | 86 | Off target |
| Ruta 27 | 88 | Off target |
| Costa Arauco | 89 | Off target |
| ACEGA / AP-53 | 92 | Watch |
| A23 Beira Interior | 94 | Watch |
| M50 | 95 | On target |
| Transmontana | 96 | On target |
| Concesiones de Madrid | 96 | On target |
| Pocahontas Parkway | 97 | On target |
Used in
The assistants read this KPI through their data tools, including this fact sheet.
Figures are demo data. Owners, approvals and feeds are demo metadata until KPI governance is set up.