Skip to main content
Portfolio performanceGlobalvia · 9 concessions · ~610 km
Sample: portfolio performance figures, for the demo and not measured, illustrative only
03 — Where should we invest next?

A €15.0M envelope funds 9 interventions and cuts modelled risk by 30.4%. Another €5M adds only 0.6 points.

Scenario: modelled risk cut and costs, not a measured or approved result
Budget envelope, 2027
FundedScenario: planning costs, not a measured or approved result
9
of 24 candidates · €14.4M
Modelled risk cutScenario: modelled risk cut, not a measured or approved result
30.4%
collision, failure and closure risk
Next €5M addsScenario: modelled extra risk cut, not a measured or approved result
+0.6
points of risk reduction
Method
HDM-4 · iRAP · inspection
ranked by risk cut per €1M
Asset condition index · 0–100

Drainage at Ruta 27 and pavement at A23 are the weakest asset groups

Asset condition index, 0 to 100, by concession and asset group. Lower values mean a greater need for investment.
ConcessionPavementStructuresDrainageBarriersSignageITS
Transmontana
74
81
62
78
83
71
A23 Beira Interior
58
66
55
72
70
68
ACEGA / AP-53
79
84
76
81
85
77
Pocahontas Parkway
71
77
73
64
80
82
Ruta 27
63
70
41
52
61
58
M50
82
88
80
85
86
54
Costa Arauco
76
79
69
66
74
72
Ruta Portuaria
84
90
78
80
88
79
Concesiones de Madrid
80
86
77
83
84
81
Need for investmentLow · 80+70–7960–6950–59High · under 50
Financial exposure

€9.5M modelled at risk if nothing changes

Scenario: financial exposure estimate, not a measured or approved result
  • Deferred maintenance liability€6.2M

    Open backlog valued at contract rates

  • Warranties ending in 12 months€2.4M

    37 assets · claim defects before expiry

  • Contract deductions at risk (deduction risk)€0.9M

    Next 6 months, from current KPI trends

Value at stakeDeduction risk
Ranked programme · top 10 of 24

Investment options

Scenario: planning costs and modelled risk cuts, not a measured or approved result
Investment options ranked by risk cut per €1M, with planning costs and modelled risk cuts as scenario assumptions
RankInterventionDriverEvidenceCostRisk cutPer €1MCumulativeIn envelope
1
High-friction surfacing and lighting
Pocahontas Parkway · km 6.2–6.8 WB
SafetyCollision register, iRAP€0.4M6.8 pts16.2€0.4MFunded
2
Drainage rehabilitation
Ruta 27 · km 30–45
ResilienceInspections, flood history€1.9M9.2 pts5.0€2.3MFunded
3
Rock-fall netting
Transmontana · km 64
ResiliencePrincipal inspection€0.8M1.8 pts2.3€3.0MFunded
4
Bridge joint replacement, 3 structures
A23 Beira Interior
ConditionPrincipal inspections€1.1M2.4 pts2.2€4.2MFunded
5
Pavement resurfacing
A23 Beira Interior · km 98–118
ConditionHDM-4 model€3.9M5.1 pts1.3€8.1MFunded
6
Safety barrier upgrade
Ruta 27 · km 50–62
SafetyiRAP star rating€1.6M2.1 pts1.3€9.7MFunded
7
Pavement preservation, surface dressing
ACEGA / AP-53 · km 10–40
ConditionHDM-4 model€1.4M1.1 pts0.8€11.1MFunded
8
Junction redesign
Costa Arauco · km 22
SafetyCollision register€2.3M1.4 pts0.6€13.4MFunded
9
Culvert lining, 6 sites
Transmontana
ConditionInspections€1.0M0.5 pts0.5€14.4MFunded
10
VMS sign renewal, 14 signs
M50
ContractAsset age, contract€2.0M0.6 pts0.3€16.4MBelow the line

Pavement options use HDM-4 deterioration models; safety options use iRAP star ratings and the collision register. Costs are planning estimates at 2027 prices and risk cuts are modelled: both are scenario assumptions, not approved budgets or measured results.

Highway structures · Condition PI and backlog

In the sample data, the structures repair backlog is €13.0M, down from €17.7M in 2021

Sample: illustrative inspections, thresholds and costs, illustrative only
Stock Condition PISample: illustrative inspections, illustrative only
85
Goodaverage, by value
Critical Condition PI
72
Fairworst critical element
Structures backlogSample: illustrative repair costs, illustrative only
€13.1M
4.9% of €269M value, including €51k of overdue inspections
Critical element below fair
62
of 171 bridges, culverts, walls and gantries

Structures by Condition PI band

Very good 37.4%Good 13.5%Fair 26.3%Poor 22.8%Very poor 0.0%

Repair backlog at each year end

Repair backlog and stock Condition PI at each year end
YearBacklogStock Condition PI
2016€13.7M85
2017€14.2M84
2018€16.6M83
2019€17.1M82
2020€17.6M83
2021€17.7M82
2022€15.3M83
2023€13.9M84
2024€12.9M85
2025€14.4M85
2026€13.0M85

Each structure counts at its latest inspection before the year end, at 2026 prices. Overdue inspections are excluded.

By concession

Structure Condition PI and backlog by concession
ConcessionStructuresPI averagePI criticalBacklog% of value
Transmontana298985€1.2M2.5%
A23 Beira Interior327955€2.1M5.9%
ACEGA / AP-53189077€616k2.5%
Pocahontas Parkway99377€352k2.7%
Ruta 27257145€6.2M13.3%
M50199085€142k0.4%
Costa Arauco278172€2.3M8.2%
Ruta Portuaria69893€1,8000.0%
Concesiones de Madrid69580€67k0.4%

By structure type

Structure Condition PI and backlog by structure type
TypeStructuresPI averagePI criticalBacklog% of value
Bridge388672€10.1M4.2%
Culvert608071€856k11.2%
Retaining wall428075€1.4M8.0%
Sign gantry317255€722k12.9%

Condition PI and Structures Backlog after the CSS Bridges Group guidance for highway structures (2007): element severity and extent, weighted by importance, then by replacement value in place of dimension × asset value factor. Backlog is repair work past each element’s intervention threshold, plus overdue principal inspections. Inspections, thresholds and costs are illustrative demo data.