Condition, people, history and liability for any road asset
You said: Which assets put the Madrid handback at risk?
Searched assets: Concesiones de Madrid, handback risk
**Clarifying forecast data** I need to figure out how to explain the high and low value forecasts. It seems like presenting all nine records might be too lengthy and unnecessary. Maybe a current table alongside the warranty could help clarify the forecast definition over the next 10 years. I’m also wondering if I can get three pavement records plus a camera for actionable data, perhaps even four in parallel, to better understand the grading by date.
Read the record for MAD-PV-0007
Read the record for MAD-PV-0006
Read the record for MAD-PV-0003
Read the record for MAD-CT-0003
Based on the demo data, nine assets put Madrid’s handback at risk, representing €3.2M in replacement value—with the pavement sections the main financial exposure.
The register is dated 31 October 2026. These are generated demo predictions of handback shortfalls, not current poor-condition assets.
| Asset | Current condition | Replacement value | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAD-PV-0007 (opens in new tab) — Pavement section at km 8.2 | 3 (Fair) | €1.5M | Expired |
| MAD-PV-0006 (opens in new tab) — Pavement section at km 5.9 | 3 (Fair) | €780k | Active |
| MAD-PV-0003 (opens in new tab) — Pavement section at km 3.5 | 2 (Good) | €715k | Expired |
| MAD-SB-0005 (opens in new tab) — Safety barrier at km 11.3 | 3 (Fair) | €197k | Expired |
| MAD-CT-0003 (opens in new tab) — CCTV camera at km 7.1 | 3 (Fair) | €14k | Expiring |
| MAD-LC-0003 (opens in new tab) — Lighting column at km 13.4 | 3 (Fair) | €4.8k | Expired |
| MAD-LC-0001 (opens in new tab) — Lighting column at km 7.2 | 3 (Fair) | €4.8k | Expired |
| MAD-TS-0002 (opens in new tab) — Traffic sign at km 9.1 | 3 (Fair) | €3.2k | Expired |
| MAD-TS-0003 (opens in new tab) — Traffic sign at km 12.2 | 3 (Fair) | €3.2k | Expired |
Priorities
None of the flagged assets is currently poor or very poor, and none has an overdue inspection. Replacement values indicate asset exposure, not the cost of making handback compliant.